AV-TEST Product Review and Certification Report – Q2/2011
During April, May and June 2011 we continuously evaluated 22 security products using their default settings. We always used the most current publicly-available version of all products for the testing. They were allowed to update themselves at any time and query their in-the-cloud services. We focused on realistic test scenarios and challenged the products against real-world threats. Products had to demonstrate their capabilities using all components and protection layers.
Vipre Antivirus Premium
Version | 4.0 |
Platform | Windows XP (SP3, 32 bit) |
Report | 112208 |
Date | Q2/2011 |
Protection
Protection against malware infections
(such as viruses, worms or Trojan horses)
More information
Industry average | April | May | June | |
Protection against 0-day malware attacks from the internet, inclusive of web and e-mail threats (Real-World Testing) 108 samples used | 81% | 87.0% | 83.0% | 72.0% |
Blocking of malware on or post execution (Dynamic Detection Testing) 34 samples used | 65% | 26.0% | ||
Detection of a representative set of malware discovered in the last 2-3 months (AV-TEST reference set) 424,860 samples used | 98% | 99.0% | 99.0% | 96.0% |
Detection of widespread malware (according to the WildList) 10,224 samples used | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Protection Score | 3.0/6.0 |
Repair
Cleaning and repair of a malware-infected computer
Industry average | April | May | June | |
Removal of all active components of widespread malware (according to the WildList) from a computer 23 samples used | 96% | 96.0% | ||
Removal of further malicious components and remediation of critical system modifications made by malware 23 samples used | 70% | 61.0% | ||
Detection of deliberately hidden active malware (Rootkits and stealth malware) 18 samples used | 78% | 83.0% | ||
Removal of deliberately hidden active malware (Rootkits and stealth malware) 18 samples used | 44% | 28.0% | ||
Repair Score | 4.0/6.0 |
Usability
Impact of the security software on the usability of the whole computer
(lower values indicate better results)
More information
Industry average | April | May | June | |
Average slow-down of the computer by the security software in daily use Number of test cases: 13 | 140% | 110s | ||
False detections of legitimate software as malware during a system scan (false positives) 699,760 samples used | 9 | 4 | 11 | 7 |
False warnings of certain actions during the installation and use of legitimate software 22 samples used | 1 | 0 | ||
False blockings of certain actions during the installation and use of legitimate software 22 samples used | 0 | 0 | ||
Usability Score | 4.0/6.0 |
Evaluation based on a point system
All products can achieve a maximum of 6 points each in the three categories of protection, performance and usability. This means 18 points are the best possible test result.
At 10 points or higher, a product is awarded the AV-TEST seal of approval.
At 17.5 points or higher, AV-TEST also issues the "TOP PRODUCT" award. Additional details ›
outstanding | satisfactory | insufficient | certificates |
Ransomware: 12 security packages and solutions for Win11 in the...
January 17, 2025 | Antivirus for Windows
ATP TEST: concealed attacks of ransomware and info stealers ...
November 20, 2024 | Antivirus for Windows
Evaluation of an Additional Security Feature for VPN’s ...
November 19, 2024 | Commissioned tests, VPN tests