AV-TEST Product Review and Certification Report – Q2/2011
During April, May and June 2011 we continuously evaluated 22 security products using their default settings. We always used the most current publicly-available version of all products for the testing. They were allowed to update themselves at any time and query their in-the-cloud services. We focused on realistic test scenarios and challenged the products against real-world threats. Products had to demonstrate their capabilities using all components and protection layers.
Protection
Protection against malware infections
(such as viruses, worms or Trojan horses)
More information
Industry average | April | May | June | |
Protection against 0-day malware attacks from the internet, inclusive of web and e-mail threats (Real-World Testing) 108 samples used | 81% | 87.0% | 90.0% | 83.0% |
Blocking of malware on or post execution (Dynamic Detection Testing) 34 samples used | 65% | 53.0% | ||
Detection of a representative set of malware discovered in the last 2-3 months (AV-TEST reference set) 424,860 samples used | 98% | 98.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% |
Detection of widespread malware (according to the WildList) 10,224 samples used | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Protection Score | 4.0/6.0 |
Repair
Cleaning and repair of a malware-infected computer
Industry average | April | May | June | |
Removal of all active components of widespread malware (according to the WildList) from a computer 23 samples used | 96% | 96.0% | ||
Removal of further malicious components and remediation of critical system modifications made by malware 23 samples used | 70% | 70.0% | ||
Detection of deliberately hidden active malware (Rootkits and stealth malware) 18 samples used | 78% | 67.0% | ||
Removal of deliberately hidden active malware (Rootkits and stealth malware) 18 samples used | 44% | 17.0% | ||
Repair Score | 3.5/6.0 |
Usability
Impact of the security software on the usability of the whole computer
(lower values indicate better results)
More information
Industry average | April | May | June | |
Average slow-down of the computer by the security software in daily use Number of test cases: 13 | 140% | 72s | ||
False detections of legitimate software as malware during a system scan (false positives) 699,760 samples used | 9 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
False warnings of certain actions during the installation and use of legitimate software 22 samples used | 1 | 0 | ||
False blockings of certain actions during the installation and use of legitimate software 22 samples used | 0 | 0 | ||
Usability Score | 5.5/6.0 |
Evaluation based on a point system
All products can achieve a maximum of 6 points each in the three categories of protection, performance and usability. This means 18 points are the best possible test result.
At 10 points or higher, a product is awarded the AV-TEST seal of approval.
At 17.5 points or higher, AV-TEST also issues the "TOP PRODUCT" award. Additional details ›
outstanding | satisfactory | insufficient | certificates |
ATP endurance test: 31 security products for 6 months in the advanced...
September 25, 2024 | Antivirus for Windows
Ransomware and info stealers: 17 security solutions in the ATP test ...
September 12, 2024 | Antivirus for Windows
Advanced EDR test 2024: Bitdefender Endpoint Security ...
September 04, 2024 | Antivirus for Windows