AV-TEST Product Review and Certification Report – Mar-Apr/2012
During March and April 2012 we continuously evaluated 22 home user security products using their default settings. We always used the most current publicly-available version of all products for the testing. They were allowed to update themselves at any time and query their in-the-cloud services. We focused on realistic test scenarios and challenged the products against real-world threats. Products had to demonstrate their capabilities using all components and protection layers.
![](/fileadmin/_processed_/8/8/csm_GFI_250x125_5455ee651c.png)
Vipre Antivirus Premium
Version | 2012 |
Platform | Windows 7 (SP1, 32 bit) |
Report | 121388 |
Date | Mar-Apr/2012 |
Protection
Protection against malware infections
(such as viruses, worms or Trojan horses)
More information
Industry average![]() | March | April | |
Protection against 0-day malware attacks, inclusive of web and e-mail threats (Real-World Testing) 103 samples used | 91% | 95.0% | 89.0% |
Detection of a representative set of malware discovered in the last 2-3 months (AV-TEST reference set) 284,818 samples used | 98% | 99.0% | 99.0% |
Detection of widespread and prevalent malware (according to AV-TEST data) 5,000 samples used | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Protection Score | 4.5/6.0 |
Repair
Cleaning and repair of a malware-infected computer
Industry average![]() | March | April | |
Detection of actively running widespread malware (including Rootkits and stealth malware) 41 samples used | 100% | 98.0% | |
Removal of all active components of widespread malware (including Rootkits and stealth malware) 41 samples used | 93% | 90.0% | |
Removal of further malicious components and remediation of critical system modifications 41 samples used | 73% | 66.0% | |
Repair Score | 3.0/6.0 |
Usability
Impact of the security software on the usability of the whole computer
(lower values indicate better results)
More information
Industry average![]() | March | April | |
Average slow-down of the computer by the security software in daily use Number of test cases: 5 | 10% | 15s | |
False detections of legitimate software as malware during a system scan (false positives) 505,040 samples used | 6 | 1 | 1 |
False warnings of certain actions during download, installation and use of legitimate software 22 samples used | 1 | 1 | |
False blockings of certain actions during download, installation and use of legitimate software 22 samples used | 1 | 0 | |
Usability Score | 4.5/6.0 |
Evaluation based on a point system
All products can achieve a maximum of 6 points each in the three categories of protection, performance and usability. This means 18 points are the best possible test result.
At 10 points or higher, a product is awarded the AV-TEST seal of approval.
At 17.5 points or higher, AV-TEST also issues the "TOP PRODUCT" award. Additional details ›
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() ![]() |
outstanding | satisfactory | insufficient | certificates |
![Security software in the advanced test – Cyber attackers are constantly tweaking new attack techniques, honing existing ones or combining them into an attack wave. In the latest Advanced Threat Protection test (ATP), the experts from AV-TEST examined how well protection products detect and fend off the newly developed attacks. In the test lab, 6 products for consumer users and 8 solutions for corporate users demonstrated how well they can parry attacks. In the test, attackers with ransomware and info stealers harnessed the techniques of dynamic API resolution, DLL sideloading, PowerShell ScriptBlockAst command concealment, cloaking themselves in known Windows tools. The test indicates that some protection products are hard put to deal with the attack techniques and cannot always withstand the attacks.](/fileadmin/_processed_/3/5/csm_1024_aufmacher_atp_634fe63c38.jpg)
ATP TEST: concealed attacks of ransomware and info stealers ...
November 20, 2024 | Antivirus for Windows
![A test commissioned by NordSec In September/October 2024, AV-TEST performed a comparison test of ExpressVPN, IPVanish VPN, Mullvad VPN, NordVPN and Proton VPN. The test focused on their additional capabilities of blocking malicious URLs and phishing websites as well as false positive avoidance.](/fileadmin/_processed_/3/e/csm_AV-TEST_NordSec_VPN_Additional_Security_Feature_Evaluation_November_2024_16da948510.png)
Evaluation of an Additional Security Feature for VPN’s ...
November 19, 2024 | Commissioned tests, VPN tests