The best Windows antivirus software for business users
During July and August 2013 we continuously evaluated 9 endpoint protection products using settings as provided by the vendor. We always used the most current publicly-available version of all products for the testing. They were allowed to update themselves at any time and query their in-the-cloud services. We focused on realistic test scenarios and challenged the products against real-world threats. Products had to demonstrate their capabilities using all components and protection layers.
Windows 7: August 2013
Producer | Certified | Protection | Performance | Usability |
F-Secure Client Security 11.00 | 100 | 58.3 | 91.7› | |
Fortinet FortiClient 5.0 | 75 | 25 | 100› | |
Kaspersky Endpoint Security 10.1 | 91.7 | 50 | 91.7› | |
McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 8.8 | 75 | 50 | 100› | |
Microsoft System Center Endpoint Protection 2012 | 0 | 83.3 | 100› | |
Sophos Endpoint Security and Control 10.2 | 83.3 | 58.3 | 100› | |
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12.1 | 100 | 83.3 | 91.7› | |
Trend Micro Office Scan 10.6 | 75 | 58.3 | 100› | |
Webroot SecureAnywhere Endpoint Protection 8.0 | 50 | 100 | 91.7› |
Producer
Certified
Protection
Performance
Usability
Evaluation based on a point system
All products can achieve a maximum of 6 points each in the three categories of protection, performance and usability. This means 18 points are the best possible test result.
At 10 points or higher, a product is awarded the AV-TEST seal of approval.
At 17.5 points or higher, AV-TEST also issues the "TOP PRODUCT" award. Additional details ›
outstanding | satisfactory | insufficient | certificates |
ATP endurance test: 31 security products for 6 months in the advanced...
September 25, 2024 | Antivirus for Windows
Ransomware and info stealers: 17 security solutions in the ATP test ...
September 12, 2024 | Antivirus for Windows
Advanced EDR test 2024: Bitdefender Endpoint Security ...
September 04, 2024 | Antivirus for Windows